Audit Workbench: Mzansi Fresh Meals

Audit Workbench: Mzansi Fresh Meals

ISO 9001:2026 Internal Auditor, assignment Part C. Criteria: ISO 9001:2026 and the site’s own procedures, with ISO 19011:2026 as guidance. Your work saves on this device as you go.

Start here: the brief

This is Part C of the assessment and carries 100 marks. You build the 2027 internal audit programme, plan two audits, run them on an evidence pack of 14 exhibits, hold the meetings, report, and decide on two corrective action responses, the way you would on a real site. Parts A and B are the two online quizzes in the same module. You need 70 percent in each part to pass.

The case study

The case is a training scenario built from real audit patterns. No real company is named.

The people on site

NameRoleDepartmentAudit training

How Part C is marked

StepWhat is checkedMarks
1. ObservationsThe auditing principles at risk in the steering meeting, and what the site should do about them, in your own words.8
2. Audit programmeFrequency from the site’s own scoring rule; the right number of audits scheduled; trained auditors who do not audit their own work or department; approval details.8
3. Audit plansObjectives, criteria and scope for each audit; opening meeting first and closing meeting last; times in order; every source of evidence planned; the night shift seen on night shift.8
4. Opening meetingsEvery item completed for both audits; the classification of findings explained; closing meeting times that match your plans.4
5. Evidence packA decision on all 14 exhibits; the planted nonconformities found against the right clause; no finding where the site conforms; the out of scope matter referred; evidence and a statement in your own words.40
6. Closing meetingsEvery item completed; the number of findings matching your evidence pack; the corrective action route and who verifies closure.4
7. Report and corrective actionReport sections, conclusion and distribution; an owner and a due date on every nonconformity; the two corrective action responses decided and reasoned against 10.2.18
ConsistencyYour programme, plans, meetings and report describe the same two audits, against the same criteria, on the same dates.10
Three conditions every pass must meet, whatever the other sections score: at least 8 of the 10 nonconformities in the evidence pack found; the corrective action response that blames operator error rejected; and no process owner auditing her or his own process in your programme.
You have three attempts. Each attempt returns your mark and feedback within a minute, naming what to fix and which lesson to go back to. Pass mark: 70. Nothing is uploaded and nobody marks by hand: the mark goes onto your course record by itself.
Your own work only. An ASC certificate is issued on work that can be shown to be yours. Use the facts of this case and the exhibits, in your own words. Do not use ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini or any other AI tool. A submission that shows no detail from the case, or reads as machine written, is returned unmarked and still uses an attempt. A second such submission ends the enrolment without a certificate.

Step 1: Observations on the steering meeting

Read the fourth paragraph of the case again. Which principles of auditing (ISO 19011:2026, 4.2 to 4.8) are put at risk by what Nomvula and Anneke proposed? Select only the ones that apply.

Step 2: Internal audit programme for 2027

Score each process 1 to 3 for importance, previous results and changes, using the facts in the table. The frequency follows from the site’s rule and appears beside your scores. Tick that many months. Choose a trained auditor who does not own the process and does not work in the department that runs it.
Swipe the table sideways for more columns.
Process and factsOwnerImp.Prev.Chg.Audits a yearAuditorJFMAMJJASOND

Step 3: Audit plans

You are the auditor for both audits. Write the objectives, criteria and scope in full: the opening meeting, the closing meeting and the report must repeat them. Plan every source of evidence you will use, in time order.

Step 4: Opening meetings

Write what you would say or confirm for each item, in short sentences.

Step 5: The evidence pack

Fourteen exhibits: seven from each audit. Read each one as the auditor on the day. Decide: nonconformity, observation, opportunity for improvement, no finding, or refer outside this audit. For a nonconformity, give the clause of ISO 9001:2026 it breaches (for example 7.1.5.2 or 8.5.1 f)), the evidence in your own words with the record numbers and dates you saw, and a statement of the gap. For no finding, say in a line why the site conforms.

Step 6: Closing meetings

Step 7: Audit report and corrective action

5. Nonconformities and corrective action requests (built from step 5)

RefExhibitClauseStatementOwnerDue date

Two corrective action responses

Two process owners have sent back responses on earlier requests. Neither comes from your evidence pack. Test each against 10.2.1 line by line, decide Accept or Reject, and give your reasoning in at least 20 words, naming the clause. For a response you accept, give the date on which you will verify effectiveness.

Step 8: Review and submit

There is nothing to download and nothing to upload. Your mark and feedback appear here within a minute and go onto your course record by themselves. We email you the same feedback with your completed audit document attached, so you can keep it or print it.