Constraint, gap, specification or red line?
Fourteen losses at Mzansi Fresh Produce, and proposals put on the table about them. Sort each one by what the programme owner should do with it. Correct safety rejections are acted on upstream. Assurance gaps are fixed in the system. Specifications are priced, then challenged. And some proposals cross a line no food loss saving justifies.
Losses and proposals on the table
Drag an item into a bin, or tap the item and then tap the bin. Both work on a phone.
Correct safety rejection
Keep the decision. Act on the source of the hazard
Quality assurance gap
The system let the problem in, or could not prove the food safe
Specification to price and challenge
A quality requirement that costs food. Price it, then challenge it with evidence
Red line: reject the proposal
It relaxes a food safety limit. Not a food loss action
ASC Food Safety Consultants. Built for the food loss and waste courses at ascfoodsafetytraining.com. Marked automatically, as many attempts as you like.